Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/1754
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDivakar, Shivprajval-
dc.contributor.authorBandyopadhyay, Ritajyoti-
dc.date.accessioned2021-12-13T09:39:46Z-
dc.date.available2021-12-13T09:39:46Z-
dc.date.issued2017-07-13-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/1754-
dc.description.abstractSocial Scientists and Biologists both seek to understand and explain the observed variations in human behaviour, but they differ in how they ascribe causal factors. Social Scientists ascribe the forces of social conditioning, culture and economics as causes for variations in human behaviour while biologists seek to explain the same in terms of differences in biological constitution. This work is an attempt at consolidating attempts from both camps from the past as well as in recent times. The aim is to familiarise people from both camps with the conventions of the discipline of the other so as to get them to engage more to develop a holistic, comprehensive and robust theory of human nature and nurture.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherIISERMen_US
dc.subjectHuman Behaviouren_US
dc.subjectBiologyen_US
dc.subjectSocial Scienceen_US
dc.titleSocial Science in the Age of Biologyen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
Appears in Collections:MS-10

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
MS10048.odt12.41 kBOpenDocument TextView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.