Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/1202
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSingh, Jorawar-
dc.contributor.otherArvind-
dc.date.accessioned2019-11-22T06:30:39Z-
dc.date.available2019-11-22T06:30:39Z-
dc.date.issued2019-11-22-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/1202-
dc.description.abstractArtificial Neural Networks (ANN) began as an imitation to the human brain on an electronic computers. The idea initiated in 1950s but it wasn’t until the availability of the modern computational prowess that it took its present form. Owning to its generalisability, it has found a wide variety application ranging from Meme Generation to Entanglement Detection Right around early 1990s, work began to extend the highly successful real valued ANN into the complex domain. But in all of its applications, the C-ANN are proposed as useful only in cases where data is of complex nature. The C-ANN is shown to perform better than R-ANN when applied to inherently complex valued data. We wish to see whether the C-valued ANN’s upper-hand over the R-valued ANN is dependent on this complex nature of the data-set or not. We compare the performance of these two networks in tasks of logic gate simulation and entanglement detection. In comparing the performance of the two networks, the C-valued ANN takes lead for simple tasks like logic gate simulations, but this lead is ambiguous when the networks are tasked with entanglement detection.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherIISERMen_US
dc.subjectArtificial Neural Networksen_US
dc.subjectHuman Brainen_US
dc.subjectLogic Gateen_US
dc.subjectEntanglement Detectionen_US
dc.titleArtificial Neural Nets and Quantum Informationen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
Appears in Collections:MS-14

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
MS14085.pdf57.04 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.