<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <title>DSpace Collection: Dissertation submitted by MS - 10 batch as part of their course</title>
  <link rel="alternate" href="http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/447" />
  <subtitle>Dissertation submitted by MS - 10 batch as part of their course</subtitle>
  <id>http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/447</id>
  <updated>2023-07-09T09:34:16Z</updated>
  <dc:date>2023-07-09T09:34:16Z</dc:date>
  <entry>
    <title>Secreted Bacterial Outer Membrane Vesicles (OMVs) and their role in pathogenesis</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/1759" />
    <author>
      <name>Minj, Ashima Valentina</name>
    </author>
    <author>
      <name>Mukhopadhyay, Arunika</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/1759</id>
    <updated>2021-12-13T10:00:52Z</updated>
    <published>2017-11-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: Secreted Bacterial Outer Membrane Vesicles (OMVs) and their role in pathogenesis
Authors: Minj, Ashima Valentina; Mukhopadhyay, Arunika
Abstract: OMVs are spherical extracellular secretions for proteins and lipids of gram-negative bacteria with Variety of functional roles of OMVs important for baceria growth survival and proliferation. OmpU in Vibrio cholerae confers a lot of properties like Bile salt resistance ,Resistance against anti-microbial peptides and in Survival and colonization in the gut . The Objective was to Characterize the role of secreted bacterial OMVs in pathogenesis . It was found that In cells treated with rOmpU , rOmpU gets translocated to the mitochondria but gets degraded 4 hours post treatment.But vesicle gets translocated to the mitochondria of the host cell and OmpU is seen to be present intact uptil 24 hrs post-treatment . hence it is Hypothesized that Intact vesicle gets translocated to the mitochondria of the host cell and OmpU gets prevented from degradation by the protective vesicle environment .</summary>
    <dc:date>2017-11-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Bias in the Distribution Of Primes</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/1758" />
    <author>
      <name>Malik, Nishant</name>
    </author>
    <author>
      <name>Paranjape, K.H.</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/1758</id>
    <updated>2021-12-13T09:53:48Z</updated>
    <published>2017-07-13T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: Bias in the Distribution Of Primes
Authors: Malik, Nishant; Paranjape, K.H.
Abstract: Any model based on the randomness of primes would strongly suggest that every residual class a(mod q) must contain roughly the same number of primes for (a; q) = 1. But despite the obviously seeming flow of logic, the above is inaccurate as a bias is obsereved in the distribution of primes when taken from different residual classes. A bias also exists in the disribution of prime pairs of form (p; p + 2k) where k 2 N. This report is a humble attempt to discover these biases and provide conjuctural explaination of such phenomenons.</summary>
    <dc:date>2017-07-13T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>K2 of a rational function field</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/1757" />
    <author>
      <name>Mishra, Sumit Chandra</name>
    </author>
    <author>
      <name>Kulshrestha, Amit</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/1757</id>
    <updated>2021-12-13T09:49:22Z</updated>
    <published>2015-07-15T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: K2 of a rational function field
Authors: Mishra, Sumit Chandra; Kulshrestha, Amit</summary>
    <dc:date>2015-07-15T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Social Science in the Age of Biology</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/1754" />
    <author>
      <name>Divakar, Shivprajval</name>
    </author>
    <author>
      <name>Bandyopadhyay, Ritajyoti</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/1754</id>
    <updated>2021-12-13T09:39:46Z</updated>
    <published>2017-07-13T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: Social Science in the Age of Biology
Authors: Divakar, Shivprajval; Bandyopadhyay, Ritajyoti
Abstract: Social Scientists and Biologists both seek to understand and explain the observed variations in human behaviour, but they differ in how they ascribe causal factors. Social Scientists ascribe the forces of social conditioning, culture and economics as causes for variations in human behaviour while biologists seek to explain the same in terms of differences in biological constitution. This work is an attempt at consolidating attempts from both camps from the past as well as in recent times. The aim is to familiarise people from both camps with the conventions of the discipline of the other so as to get them to engage more to develop a holistic, comprehensive and robust theory of human nature and nurture.</summary>
    <dc:date>2017-07-13T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
</feed>

